Google Denies Search Rank-fixing Allegations

Google Denies Search Rank-fixing
Allegations
Google released a statement Monday defending its most recent update to its search algorithm that caused some popular websites to fall drastically in search rankings. One of the worst hit sites by the “Panda” update, as Google called it, was Ciao.co.uk, a Microsoft-owned website that had been at the forefront of a developing EU competition case against the world's search leader. Ciao's web visibility reportedly plummeted 94 percent as a result of the update, which Ciao officials say is evidence that Google rigs its rankings.
Scott Huffman, head of Google's search evaluation, said it is “almost absurd” to suggest the results were rigged. The Mountain View, California-based company routinely makes changes to its search algorithms with the intent of weeding out “content farms”, or sites that copy material from other sites in order to drive traffic. Where a keyword search may have previously returned a website to Google's first page, a change to the algorithm may push it down further in the rankings.
When the Panda update launched around the world on April 11th, Google published a blog entry explaining that its purpose was to “reduce rankings for low-quality sites.” Shopping and comparison sites like Ciao.co.uk often suffer from these algorithm adjustments because they contain comments and reviews that appear elsewhere on the Internet. A 94 percent drop, however, is extremely unusual, insiders say.
Ciao, and its parent company Microsoft, were instrumental in initiating an EU investigation into Google last November, claiming that the search giant used its dominant position to limit rivals' products.
Google released a statement Monday defending its most recent update to its search algorithm that caused some popular websites to fall drastically in search rankings. One of the worst hit sites by the “Panda” update, as Google called it, was Ciao.co.uk, a Microsoft-owned website that had been at the forefront of a developing EU competition case against the world's search leader. Ciao's web visibility reportedly plummeted 94 percent as a result of the update, which Ciao officials say is evidence that Google rigs its rankings.
Scott Huffman, head of Google's search evaluation, said it is “almost absurd” to suggest the results were rigged. The Mountain View, California-based company routinely makes changes to its search algorithms with the intent of weeding out “content farms”, or sites that copy material from other sites in order to drive traffic. Where a keyword search may have previously returned a website to Google's first page, a change to the algorithm may push it down further in the rankings.
When the Panda update launched around the world on April 11th, Google published a blog entry explaining that its purpose was to “reduce rankings for low-quality sites.” Shopping and comparison sites like Ciao.co.uk often suffer from these algorithm adjustments because they contain comments and reviews that appear elsewhere on the Internet. A 94 percent drop, however, is extremely unusual, insiders say.
Ciao, and its parent company Microsoft, were instrumental in initiating an EU investigation into Google last November, claiming that the search giant used its dominant position to limit rivals' products.
Comments
Games
Alias
3 Foot Ninja 2
ALIAS 2
Air Dodge
Battle Tanks
Bomber Bob
Cable Capers
Gem Mania
Hacker
Hostile Skies
Mission Mars
Bowling
Samurai Warrior
The Pharoh's Tomb
Monkey Lander
Muay Thai
Action
Donkey Kong Banana Barrage
501 Dart Challenge
Rooftop Skater
Zelda
Donkey Kong
Xtreme Pinball
Tetris
Connect 4
Battleships
Frogger
Penguin Push
Online Video Poker
Spank The Monkey
Mob Pay Back
Dealer
Yeti Sports Seal Bounce
Hold Your Drink Steady
Solitaire
Canyon Glider
3D Sudoku
Metal Slug Rampage
Street Fighter II
Flashman
Disc Golf
Table Tennis
Ninja Air Combat
Celebrity Hitman Terrorist Alert
Spider Solitaire
Tubin
Presidential Knockout
Global Player
Ma Balls
Baseball
Beckham Fit






0 Comments
Click here to sign up now.